如今很多推銷員推介年金,在銀行裡有人向你推銷,保險代理當然會向你推銷,會計師和律師也向人推銷年金,大部份「理財顧問」和「投資顧問」主要都是在推銷年金。年金雖然收入有延稅好處,卻有高費用和很長的「綁死期」,一般家庭都不應該使用。即使收入高和稅率高的家庭,也應該使用「低費用」和沒有「綁死期」的年金,這些年金可以直接透過折扣經紀行購買。
年金(ANNUITY) ,是近年來相當流行的儲蓄投資工具,不少財務顧問和保險經紀,都樂意推薦。但聰明的消費者在投資年金之前,都應該謹慎考慮,知道其優點與缺點。
什麼是年金?
年金,是由人壽保險公司提供的退休儲蓄工具,最普遍的是「延期年金」(DEFERRED ANNUITY),由投資者逐年存入若干金額,由保險公司給予每年固定利息收益,便是「定息年金」(FIXED ANNUITY) ;更流行的,是將年金投資在保險公司提供的股票共同基金,便是「變動年金」(VARIABLE ANNUITY) 。前者風險低,但收益也比較低;後者在股票價值上升時,可提供更高的收益,但假如基金價值下跌,投資者是會有虧蝕的風險,除非一直持有年金直到離世。
年金有何優點?
雖然存入年金的資金不能扣稅,但帳戶內的收益可以長期延稅,這是年金最大的優點。若有朋友,由於稅率甚高,在用盡了雇主提供的退休儲蓄計劃(如401-K等)和「個人退休帳戶」(IRA)之類工具後,仍想利用其他延稅工具作投資,便可考慮年金。
除了延稅的好處外,年金沒有最高金額限制,也沒有規定每年必須作投資。使用「變動年金」,資金可透過共同基金,分散投資在不同種類的公司股票,得到股票市場較高的長期收益。通常,由一種基金轉到另一種基金,手續相當簡便,也不會失去延稅好處。
年金?包含了「人壽保險」,但這保險與一般人壽保險有別,只是保證帳戶持有人一旦過世時,受益人可起碼取得存入帳戶的本金,即不會因投資市值下跌,而蒙受損失。近年有些年金,甚至按帳戶市值上升,逐漸提高受益人起碼收取的金額。此外,年金在交付遺產收益人時,不必通過「認證」(PROBATE) 過程。
一般退休帳戶規定,七十歲半時開始提取,並為延稅的金額繳稅。年金投資者,可選擇較遲才開始提取,來增加延稅好處。提取時也可按本身情況,在多種提取方式中作選擇。
年金有何缺點?
年金最大的缺點,是費用較高,每年比一般共同基金投資費用,高出百分之一至二。假如你在開戶七至十年取消年金,保險公司通常收取甚高的「取消罰金」(SURRENDER CHARGE) 。此外,在五十九歲半前作提取,國稅局需收取百分之十罰金 。投資年金,也缺乏轉換保險公司的靈活性。因此,年金只應作為長期投資工具。
年金雖可延稅,但在提取時,收益需當為普通收入算稅,稅率比一般長期投資收益增值稅率高。目前聯邦長期投資增值稅最高是百分之十五,普通收入稅率在百分之十五範圍內的朋友,長期投資增值稅只是百分之五,年金收益無法享受這些比較低的稅率。
可供年金帳戶選擇的共同基金,通常範圍較窄,查閱基金成績也較為不方便。此外,一般經遺產交給受益人的資產,都可將成本「提升」(STEP UP) 到當時市值,為受益人省下投資增值稅,但年金是極少數不獲得成本提升的資產之一。
年金還有一個缺點,嚴格來說是銷售手法上的缺點。大部份年金都是透過推銷員出售,推銷員包括﹕保險代理、財務顧問、銀行職員、會計師甚至律師。不同推銷員手法良莠不齊,有些只向收入與稅率較高者推銷,並詳細為投資者解釋好處與壞處,但也有個別推銷員不顧對方財務背景,為了賺取6-8%佣金,用盡方法向所有人推銷,不管對方是否適合,甚至只介紹好處,壞處一概不提,所以消費者應該自己謹慎,未投資之前,應該先清楚了解該年金合約的條款,包括費用和鎖定期罰金。如果不方便看英文的話,應該找人代您看清楚才作決定。
適合投資年金嗎?
讀者應先盡量利用一般退休儲蓄工具,如本身稅率相當高,並有作為長期投資的資金,且希望得到延稅好處,再考慮使用年金。近年來,多家折扣經紀公司,包括SCHWAB,FIDELITY,VANGUARD 等,提供低年費和免「提前取消罰金」的年金,可供選擇的共同基金種類也比較多,大家不妨先作比較。
州府檢控年金銷售公司
零五年二月十日,加州檢察總長洛克耶BILL LOCKYER 起訴了四家財務計劃公司與負責人,指控他們涉嫌哄騙數千名老人家,參加了不當和不必要的投資計劃,騙款高達一億元以上。
這幾家公司的手法,是在報紙上大登廣告,和利用直接郵件,邀請老人家參加「生前信托」講座,並且標榜比一般律師低廉得多的收費。其實,這些公司的真正目的不是要為老人家設立生前信托,而是要向他們推銷投資產品,主要是推銷年金產品。
年金是保險公司提供的退休儲蓄工具,本身有稅務優點,但也有缺點,主要是費用高昂和年期長。這些老人家投資年金時不知道在指定年期內作提取,會有極高的罰金。根據檢查處發言人稱,半數以上受害人超過65歲,他們在有生之年都不可以免罰金作提取。
其實,不論年紀長幼,利用年金作投資或儲蓄,都應該清楚了解該年金合約的條款,包括費用和鎖定期罰金。如果不方便看英語的話,應該找人代您看清楚才作決定。
注意年金費用與提取罰金
「年金」(ANNUITY)作為一種退休儲蓄工具,是有稅務好處的,雖然存入的本金不能延稅,年金的收益卻不必每年在報稅時申報,將來作提取時才需要當為收入報稅。可是,投資者應該先盡量利用「合稅務資格」(QUALIFIED)的退休儲蓄計劃(包括401-K,IRA等),因為這些計劃本金和收益都可以延稅。
年金通常有一個弱點,就是每年需要付一定的費用,其中包括行政和管理費用,亦加上人壽保險費用。這個人壽保險與一般保險不同,它的賠償金額只限於戶主去世時年金帳戶蒙守的虧蝕,所以可能只有很少甚至零賠償金額,可是戶主要長期負擔這些費用,平均每年超過1.41%,另外還要加上共同基金內的管理費用,這些費用都會直接影響「年金」收益。
除了每年費用比較高之外,通常「年金」都有「提前取消罰金」(SURRENDER CHARGE),罰金期一般頗長,平均為七年左右,有些甚至長達十年。被罰金期「綁死」是「年金」缺點之一。
要解決費用高和罰金的問題,投資者應該留意一些收費低和沒有「罰金期」的年金產品。
低費用的「年金」
投資者可考慮一些低收費及完全沒有提前取出罰金的年金,通常是直接向一些折扣經紀行購買,例如FIDELITY、CHARLES SCHWAB、VANGUARD、T.ROWE PRICE等經紀行或投資公司,都有低收費的年金(大約0.5%),而且是百分百沒有提前取消罰金,這些費用低很多的年金一樣有延稅好處。
退休儲蓄應放入年金嗎?
個人退休儲蓄帳戶口(IRA),本身已經有延稅好處,即該帳戶內的收益,一直不必付稅,直至將來作提取時,才按當時的稅率付稅。不少納稅人存放IRA的本金,都可以在當年扣稅,即本利都有延稅的優惠。
有些財務顧問建議將IRA帳戶資金,放入一個由保險公司提供的年金(ANNUITY)合約;年金本身有稅務的好處,主要是收益可以延稅,但年金通常有相當多的費用,而且多數有長達多年的罰款期,假如在六年至八年內將年金提取,或將它轉到其他公司的年金戶口,都可能要繳付罰金。
由於IRA本身已有延稅好處,理論上無需將IRA資金放在年金合約內,因為「雙重延稅」是沒有實際意義的。
年金合約另一特點,是將來可以選擇多種不同的提取方式,可以帶來終生收入。但其實IRA帳戶本身,亦可以在將來作提取時轉為「現金年金」,一樣可以得到終生提取的好處。建議大家未將IRA存放年金合約前,應先了解年金的優點及缺點。
認識「即時年金」
有一種相當保守的財務工具,是由保險公司提供的,讓退休者每個月有固定的收入,一生中都不會停止。這工具稱為「即時年金」(IMMEDIATE ANNUITY)或「現金年金」(CASH ANNUITY)。
做法是用一筆資金去購買一個「即時年金」合約,年紀越大,每個月所收到的金額越高,因為保險公司估計你的預期壽數比較低。你每月收到的金額通常比銀行存款利率稍高,因為保險公司每個月除了付出利息外,亦同時退還小部份本金。
舉個例:一位六十歲的男士,以十萬元買了一份「即時年金」合約,以後每個月可以取得大約$570,每年可獲十萬元的6.8%。但一位七十歲男士,買一份的十萬元「即時年金」,每個月就可收到大約$730,每年可獲十萬元的8.8%。
「即時年金」雖然可以終生提供固定的收入,但本金是不能取回或留給後人的,而且每月獲得的金額也不會改變。有些人擔心買了「即時年金」後數年便逝世,豈非吃了大虧?有些「即時年金」,由保險公司保證在一個固定時期內付款,即使年金合約持有人在固定時期完結前逝世,家人仍可繼續收款,但該種年金每個月所收取的固定金額也比較低。
What You Don’t Know About Annuities
When buying annuities, beware of the small print and fees.
By Michael Rittershaus, Contributor July 30, 2015
There are three types of annuities, but each has its own unique set of pitfalls of which to be aware.
If you’re like many Americans, you’ve found yourself considering incorporating annuities into your retirement savings plan at one point or another. The concept may seem both simple and attractive – giving up some money now so you can have money later – but the truth is that annuities are much more complex and less of a guaranteed income source than brokers or other salespeople would have you believe.
One major drawback to annuities is the considerable amount of fees. Unlike mutual funds and/or exchange-traded funds, you are required to pay additional fees, such as mortality and expense charges as well as surrender charges – not something suited for a long-term investor. In addition, the insurance companies selling the annuities often layer on annual fees, which can range from 1.3 percent to 3.5 percent. All of these fees add up over time and can put a significant damper on your returns.
Another critical consideration when it comes to annuities is the small print. If you don’t review everything carefully, you may pay for your lack of attention in more ways than one. Recently, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission have issued several investor alerts on annuities and the unique issues associated with them. For example, some annuities are so complex that their prospectus is more than 150 pages and others have been called out for having high commissions and other hidden traps.
Taxes are another important, often-overlooked detail. When you withdraw money from an annuity, the gains are considered ordinary income and can be taxed by as much as 35 percent at the federal level. By comparison, when you sell a mutual fund, the money you receive is considered a long-term capital gain, which incurs a tax rate no greater than 15 percent.
If you’ve begun exploring annuities, you may know there are three primary types, each of which has its own unique set of pitfalls of which to be aware:
1. Fixed annuities. These are frequently considered the least complicated of the three since they have a fixed interest rate (hence their name). However, they often forfeit any remaining money to the insurance company rather than pay it to beneficiaries if the owner dies before the contract expires.
2. Equity-indexed annuities. These can appear enticing for guaranteeing a minimum interest rate while providing the opportunity for greater gains if the stock index to which they’re tied performs well. But insurance companies often set strict caps on maximum annual returns. So if the market rises 60 percent, for example, don’t get too excited. Your annual return may be capped at 10 percent, resulting in much less profit than you may have anticipated.
3. Variable annuities. This class catches the attention of many with no annual contribution limits and a broad array of investment choices, but beware of their commission fees – they’re among the highest in the investment industry. Also, the taxes associated with variable annuities are frequently greater and more complex than you’ll find with other annuities or investments.
The bottom line is that it’s imperative to thoroughly research the details of any annuity and make sure you understand them before you invest. An easy way to do this is to talk with a reputable investment advisor. He or she can be a valuable resource who can help you decide not just whether an annuity is right for you, but which type of retirement savings vehicles overall are best for your personal goals and financial well-being.
Allianz保險公司為年金銷售作賠償
當大家考慮購買「即時年金」時,除了要分析自己的需要外,更要小心比較多家保險公司的付款金額。
零八年二月十五日星島日報與三藩市紀事報報導﹕
被控欺騙顧客 安聯人壽願賠錢和解 |
(星報日報記者時晨光屋崙報道 )
加州保險局長龐斯納(Steve Poizner)昨日在屋崙宣布一項與安聯人壽保險公司(Allianz)的1000萬元和解協議,因為該公司被指控以不當手法,欺騙數以千計耆英購買不適當的固定年金(Fixed Annuities)計劃。保險局長稱這項和解協議意義重大,一方面能終止多年來針對年長者的高壓和誤導性推銷圖謀,並逼促大保險公司承擔責任,更審慎核批固定年金計劃,防止老人受騙。 按照和解協議,在2004年1月至2005年7月之間,約288名被不當推銷延期年金 (Deferred Annuity)產品的長者,將能夠取消其合約。另外,估計約有1萬名同期購買延期年金產品的長者,如果能證實被不當推銷買入產品,亦可以取消其合約。查詢或投訴有關問題,可以電加州保險局熱線電話1800-927-4357,當局指有多語言的翻譯服務提供。 調查亦發現有126名年齡介乎84至85歲的老人,被安聯人壽以有誤導性的廣告誘導,買下不合適的固定年金計劃去取締其舊有的計劃。龐斯納指,和解協議中亦要求安聯人壽設立保護消費者的機制去防止問題再發生。安聯人壽將會複核和評估任何65歲以上購買固定年金產品的個案,確保產品適合購物人需要。龐斯納稱,這項要求將用作監督業界出售固定年金產品的標準。 所謂固定年金(Fixed Annuities) ,是保險公司發售的一種退休儲蓄的財務工具,消費者購買計劃旨在為退休生活提供保障,增加穩定收入來源。通常消費者會存錢入年金帳戶獲取利息,並在退休後從帳戶中領取金錢。 安聯人壽保險公司就是加州最大的固定年金產品銷售者,去年10月,安聯人壽亦與基地所在地的明尼蘇達州檢察長辦公室,達成類似的和解協議。 |
Company settles deceptive sales complaint for $10 million
Thursday, February 14, 2008
San Francisco Chronicle
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/02/14/financial/f142018S15.DTL
(02-14) 14:20 PST Oakland, Calif. (AP) —
Allianz Life Insurance Company has settled a $10 million complaint that it sold deceptive annuities to thousands of seniors, Insurance Commissioner Steve Poizner said Thursday.
The settlement brings to a close findings by the California Department of Insurance that Allianz, the state’s largest seller of annuities, had persuaded seniors to buy confusing insurance policies that didn’t fit their needs.
“The fact that Allianz used deceptive practices and high-pressure sales tactics to lure and cajole seniors into buying unsuitable policies is appalling," Poizner said in a statement.
Annuities are popular tax deferred savings tool for many Americans who typically give a life insurance company a lump sum of money. In return, the insurer makes period payments to the policyholder at some future date.
The state’s review in 2006 showed that Minneapolis-based Allianz advertised immediate and upfront bonuses to consumers who purchased their annuities, however they were later denied cash payments for at least five years.
When the company replaced 126 existing annuities for seniors between 84 and 85 years old, 97 percent of the policies were financially unsuitable, the analysis found.
Gary Bhojwani, president and chief executive officer of Allianz Life, said the settlement would allow the company to focus on providing first-class products to its consumers instead of litigation. The company did not acknowledge any wrongdoing in the settlement.
“With a complaint rate of less than one percent, it is clear that our sales force does an excellent job explaining our products and that the consumer safeguards and disclosures we have put in place over the years have been effective," Bhojwani said in a statement.
As part of the settlement, Allianz said it would take extra steps to ensure applicants 65 and older are sold more appropriate annuities.
Seniors who were sold unsuitable annuities also will be allowed to cancel their policies, according to Poizner’s office.
AARP 刊物提醒避免年金產品
AARP 是一個中立的非牟利機構,其雙月刊是美國讀者最多的刊物之一,在零七年七月、八月號刊物中,有一篇文章,題目是「避免這些與金錢有關的陷阱」,其中一項是提訪年金,與本人看法相同。
Avoid These Money Traps
By Walecia Konrad, July & August 2007
Ten common mistakes that can really cost you
Buying Variable Annuities
The cardinal rule of investing is, keep things simple, and variable annuities are anything but, melding the potential for growth that comes from stock investing with the guarantee of a steady income that all annuities are supposed to provide. Mixing motives costs you. The average annual expense fee for a variable annuity is 2.39 percent of assets, compared with the average mutual fund expense fee of 1.36 percent. (To see what a difference 1 percent can make, check out the chart below under “Paying High Fees to Invest.")
Need we say more? We could, because that number doesn’t even include sales commissions or surrender charges applied if you pull your money out years later. And the fund monitor Morningstar reports that the average variable annuity underperformed the average mutual fund no matter what time span it examined—one year, three years, five years, or ten years. For the past ten years the average variable annuity invested in stocks posted an annual return of 6.72 percent, compared with the average fund return of 8.71 percent.
What’s Wrong With Variable Annuities
Updated on January 30, 2008.
VARIABLE ANNUITIES are sold more aggressively than fake Gucci handbags on the streets of New York City. Thanks in part to commissions of 5% or more, sales of variable annuities have soared over the past decade.
But popularity is no indicator of practicality. The truth is, annuities only make sense for a tiny fraction of the population. (See story.) The rest of us should be buying plain old mutual funds. Of course, that’s not easy to say to your dark-suited cousin who keeps taking you out for steak and Lafitte-Rothschild Bordeaux in hopes that you will sign on the dotted line. But, next time he invites you, you can bring along this article. Just make sure he pays the bill before you give it to him.
The Basics
First, a primer. A variable annuity is basically a tax-deferred investment vehicle that comes with an insurance contract, usually designed to protect you from a loss in capital. Thanks to the insurance wrapper, earnings inside the annuity grow tax-deferred, and the account isn’t subject to annual contribution limits like those on other tax-favored vehicles like IRAs and 401(k)s. Typically you can choose from a menu of mutual funds, which in the variable annuity world are known as “subaccounts." Withdrawals made after age 59 1/2 are taxed as income. Earlier withdrawals are subject to tax and a 10% penalty.
Variable annuities can be immediate or deferred. With a deferred annuity the account grows until you decide it’s time to make withdrawals. And when that time comes (which should be after age 59 1/2, or you owe an early withdrawal penalty) you can either annuitize your payments (which will provide regular payments over a set amount of time) or you can withdraw money as you see fit.
Fees, Fees and More Fees
Variable annuities are notorious for the fees they charge. Indeed, the average annual expense on variable annuity subaccounts currently stands at 2.44% of assets, according to Morningstar. (This figure includes fund expenses plus insurance expenses.) The average open-ended mutual fund (excluding municipals), on the other hand, charges just 1.32%. Unfortunately, variable annuity fees don’t stop there. Many variable annuities act like B shares of mutual funds, paying commission from the ongoing fees; the average contract fee is $30 to $35.
What Death Benefit?
The death benefit basically guarantees that your account will hold a certain value should you die before the annuity payments begin. With basic accounts, this typically means that your beneficiary will at least receive the total amount invested — even if the account has lost money. For an added fee, this figure can be periodically “stepped-up" or earn a small amount of interest. (If you opt not to annuitize, then the death benefit typically expires at a certain age, often around 75 years old.) Well, given the fact that stocks have returned an average of 12% annually (assuming dividends are reinvested) from 1926 to 2007, according to the Center for Research in Security Prices, over the long haul you need this insurance about as much as a duck needs a paddle to swim.
OK, investors who bought annuities and then died within the next two months probably got their money’s worth. But, consider this: The death benefit was triggered in only 1% of all policies from 2002 to 2004, according to Limra International, an insurance-industry research group.
While all variable annuities come with a standard death benefit, the average price for additional death benefits is 0.43%, according to Morningstar.
Surrender Fees
Another problem with most variable annuities is that your money is often locked up for several years — typically five. Trying to withdraw funds during this time will result in huge fines. These fees typically decrease as the years tick by. For example, you might be charged a 6% surrender fee for a withdrawal during your first year of ownership. After seven years, however, that could be just 1%. The average maximum fee is a steep 5.94%, according to Morningstar.
Early Withdrawal Penalty
As with most retirement accounts, if you withdraw funds before age 59 1/2, you’ll be hit with a 10% early withdrawal tax penalty.
The Taxes
Gains in variable annuities are taxed at ordinary income tax rates, which go as high as 35%. For most investors, that’s a whole lot higher than the 15% rate they now pay on their long-term mutual fund gains. (Dividend income is taxed at a rate of up to 15%.) And that tax difference can easily eat up the advantage of an annuity’s tax-free compounding. “You’re generally going to have to wait 15 to 20 years before these suckers become more tax efficient than a mutual fund," says CFP Dee Lee of Harvard, Mass.
Residents of some states may pay even more taxes on nonqualified variable annuity accounts. (That is, accounts that are not purchased within an IRS-approved retirement plan like a 401(k), 403(b) or IRA.) Some states also add a tax for variable annuities purchased within a qualified account.
The World’s Lousiest Estate-Planning Vehicle
There’s no getting around the income tax due on annuities. In fact, if you die with money remaining in your annuity, your beneficiary will inherit all the taxes that you have deferred. Compare this to a mutual fund, whose basis is stepped-up at death. In that case, your beneficiary would owe no taxes on the gains. Both types of accounts — annuities and mutual funds — are liable for federal estate taxes on anything over the federal estate tax exemption ($2 million for 2007-2008).
Switch to a Low-Fee Variable Annuity
Now, if you’ve read all this and still want to buy an annuity, do yourself a favor and buy one with low costs and good investment options. These are available from mutual fund companies like Vanguard(average total expenses, 0.57%, including mortality and expense risk charges) and T. Rowe Price(average mutual fund expenses range from 0.35% to 1.05%, plus an additional 0.55% mortality and expense risk charge). Investors who already own run-of-the-mill high-priced annuities should consider a tax-free transfer — called a 1035 exchange — to a better quality, low-fee annuity. Just be sure to confirm that your surrender charges have expired before you make the switch.
From SmartMoney
http://www.smartmoney.com/personal-finance/retirement/whats-wrong-with-variable-annuities-9512/
華爾街日報報導EQUITY INDEX 年金訴訟多
近來許多聽眾讀者來電子郵件,問我有關於EQUITY INDEX ANNUITY (與股票指數掛鉤的年金),因為現在許多推銷員(包括﹕理財顧問、會計師、律師等)都在推銷這種比較新的年金產品。我給他們的勸告都是﹕不要盡信推銷者的促銷言論,一般這些EIA都不適合投資者。
以下是零七年八月八日在華爾街日報的專文報導,不單敘述了許多與EIA有關的訴訟實例,更指出這種年金產品的問題,請凡是考慮投資EIA種類年金的朋友細讀。
Backlash Hits Annuities Tied To Stock Market
Wave of Lawsuits Take Aim At Sales Practices, Suitability
Of Equity-Indexed Products
By KELLY GREENE
August 8, 2007; Page D1
Equity-indexed annuities are among the hottest products sold through seminars, infomercials and free-dinner events that target older adults with investment pitches. Now, insurers that sell them are facing growing legal claims from investors and state regulators who allege that the companies or their agents are using deceptive marketing or targeting consumers who are too old to benefit from the products.
FAIR WARNING
Equity-indexed annuities can be complex. Here’s what to consider:
- Make sure you understand how gains will be calculated.
- Check for hidden penalties for early withdrawals.
- These annuities may not be suitable for older adults because funds may be locked up for several years.
In the biggest such case, the Eighth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in St. Louis last month upheld the class-action status of a lawsuit that covers more than 400,000 investors who bought equity-indexed annuities from Allianz Life Insurance Co. of North America, a unit of Munich-based Allianz SE and the top seller of this type of annuity in the U.S. More than a dozen federal lawsuits against a number of insurers also are seeking class-action status in courts across the country. Meanwhile, attorneys general and regulators in Illinois, Minnesota and California are pursuing claims against insurers selling the products.
“Equity-indexed annuities have emerged as the vehicle of choice for unscrupulous insurance agents," says Roxanne Rehm, assistant general counsel for the Florida Department of Financial Services. Older investors, she contends, “don’t realize they’re long-term investments, and once they realize they can’t access the funds, it’s usually too late."
An equity-indexed annuity, as the name indicates, is one whose performance is tied to the stock market. A person invests a lump sum, or makes a series of payments during a “deferral period" that is often five to six years, and is guaranteed a minimum return based on changes in an equity index (like the Standard & Poor’s 500-stock index). If stock prices rise, returns can increase; if stocks fall, investors at worst realize no gains. When the deferral period ends, investors can take either a lump-sum payment or “annuitize" the account, meaning they would get a series of payments over a set period, or for life.
The promise of potential gains and little downside risk has fueled sales of equity-indexed annuities, which climbed to $25.3 billion in 2006 from $6.5 billion just five years earlier, according to Advantage Compendium Ltd., a consulting firm that tracks annuity data.
But critics say equity-indexed annuities do, in fact, carry risks, especially for older investors who may need access to their money before the investment’s term ends. Some of these annuities are structured to provide only a small portion of market-index gains; carry high surrender, or early withdrawal charges (12.5% for some of the more popular products) that can last for much or all of a contract’s term; and often involve relatively rich sales commissions that regulators say can make it tough for consumers to get unbiased advice.
Like some other types of annuities, equity-indexed annuities can be useful for investors seeking guaranteed income. But equity-indexed products also offer some potential for gains tied to the stock market. It’s important for investors to understand such terms as how the interest will be calculated and if there are hidden penalties. There is controversy whether equity-indexed annuities are appropriate for older people because their money is typically locked up for several years.
Some advisers suggest investors compare returns on equity-indexed annuities with other products such as certificates of deposit, which can yield around 5% these days, and variable annuities with guaranteed minimum income benefits, which offer a similar downside safety net.
The big class-action case against Allianz centers on the marketing of so-called immediate bonuses that are paid to people when they buy an annuity, typically an amount between 5% and 10%. Plaintiffs say investors actually have to wait years for the money, if they can get their hands on it at all; Allianz responds that the bonuses are immediate because their value is credited to investors’ accounts the day they buy the annuity, meaning they can start earning interest based on a bonus’s value right away.
In September, Michael Altschul, a 60-year-old sales representative in Laguna Niguel, Calif., paid $250,000 for an equity-indexed annuity from Allianz after hearing it described in a radio infomercial. “The protection of principal was a huge draw for me," he says, as was the $25,000 bonus. Mr. Altschul says the agent who sold him the policy told him he could withdraw 10% of his initial investment each year for 10 years, and then withdraw the balance.
But in June, he noticed an online article about the Allianz product he bought, posted by a financial planner, and realized he can withdraw 10% a year only for the first five years, although this would cut into his gains. After that, unless he annuitizes the balance for 10 years, he would lose the promised bonus and much of the interest his money could earn, and could be subject to hefty surrender charges. “That was news to me," he says.
An Allianz spokesman says that privacy laws prevent the insurer from discussing Mr. Altschul’s individual situation, but the materials the insurer provided “at the point of sale clearly explain the product," and the insurer encourages customers with concerns to “contact us so that we can conduct a thorough review."
A lawsuit filed by Illinois Attorney General Lisa Madigan last year in Sangamon County Circuit Court alleges that “deceptive" mailers sent to older people offering help with estate planning and Medicare were used to schedule appointments with agents selling annuities for American Investors Life Insurance Co., now part of Aviva PLC. Mary Menges, a 70-year-old retired nurse in Collinsville, Ill., says she responded to a postcard offering help in “understanding your money situation" two years ago and was persuaded to move her individual retirement account, $170,000 in mutual funds, into an equity-indexed annuity.
“I didn’t know this was an insurance company at all," she says. After her son learned about the move and explained the restrictions on withdrawals to her, the mother and son wrote a letter to the company and also reported her experience to the attorney general’s office. She got her money back, she says.
Michael Vaughan, a Kansas City, Mo., attorney representing American Investors, says the company has “seen no evidence that this is a broad-based issue." He declined to comment further.
The California Department of Insurance has taken a close look at Allianz’s marketing to older people, specifically examining sales to 126 people who were at least 84 years old, and who replaced existing annuities with equity-indexed or immediate annuities. Elderly customers incurred new surrender charges in more than 100 such cases from Jan. 1, 2004, through July 31, 2005, the department says in a regulatory filing.
Allianz says age is only one of a number of factors involved in determining whether an annuity is appropriate for a customer, and that its “business conduct was proper."
Insurers selling equity-indexed annuities are starting to face challenges from securities regulators as well. Debate has raged for at least two years among securities regulators, insurance departments and industry trade groups over who should have oversight. So far, the Securities and Exchange Commission hasn’t weighed in, but it could deem the products securities if it chose to do so.
In December, Massachusetts’s top securities regulator, Secretary of the Commonwealth William F. Galvin, fined Investors Capital Corp., a unit of Investors Capital Holdings Ltd., $500,000 for allowing its representatives to use “unregistered investment advisory services to sell equity-indexed annuities to unsuspecting elderly customers." Steven Preskenis, Investors Capital Corp.’s chief operating officer and general counsel, said in a statement the company was pleased to resolve the issue and take part in restitution, and it looked forward to working with state officials to improve “oversight, understanding and education of these financial products."
And Joseph Borg, director of the Alabama Securities Commission, has found a new approach: “If the agents are advising people to sell mutual funds or get out of 401(k)s, they are acting as investment advisers. And in my state, being an unregistered investment adviser is a felony." In “dozens" of equity-indexed annuity sales the state has investigated in the past few years, he says, insurers have “paid the money back, plus 6% interest."